Legal & Policies

Legal information governing the use of EAIPAM

These policies explain how EAIPAM provides its services, processes manuscripts, protects user information, manages payments and communicates the limitations of its assessments, including plagiarism and similarity analysis where applicable.

01

Terms of Service

The conditions governing access to EAIPAM, account responsibilities, payments, manuscript processing, intellectual-property rights and service limitations.

Read policy
02

Privacy Policy

Information about the personal data EAIPAM collects, why it is processed, how it is protected and the rights available to users.

Read policy
03

Refund Policy

The circumstances in which payments may be refunded, credited or treated as non-refundable after an assessment begins.

Read policy
04

Cancellation Policy

The procedures and conditions for cancelling an assessment, subscription or future service renewal.

Read policy
05

Acceptable Use Policy

The standards users must follow when uploading manuscripts, accessing reports and using EAIPAM services.

Read policy
06

Data-Retention Policy

How long manuscripts, reports, account records, transaction data and security logs are retained and how deletion may be requested.

Read policy
07

Security

The technical and organisational measures used to protect accounts, unpublished manuscripts, reports and associated information.

Read policy
08

Scientific and Editorial Disclaimer

Important limitations concerning EAIPAM integrity-risk scores, plagiarism and similarity findings, reference findings, scientific observations and AI-mediated writing-pattern assessments.

Read policy
Important notice

EAIPAM provides editorial decision-support, not a determination of misconduct

EAIPAM findings, similarity results and integrity-risk scores support editorial assessment. They do not independently establish AI authorship, fabrication, plagiarism, research misconduct or other wrongdoing. Similarity percentages indicate textual overlap and are not mathematically combined with the EAIPAM integrity-risk score. Final decisions remain with the responsible editor, publisher, institution or authorised decision-maker.