EEAIPAMScholarly Integrity Platform
Login / Create AccountStart assessment
Editorial AI Probability Assessment Matrix

Scholarly integrity assessment built around evidence, not guesswork.

EAIPAM helps publishers, editors and research institutions examine reference reliability, citation accuracy, scientific reasoning and indicators of undisclosed AI-mediated drafting.

Calculate assessment price
FeedbackMy Feedback
Beyond language-pattern detectionEvidence-based AI risk assessmentScientific inconsistency analysis
Chapter assessmentReview required

Reference and evidence integrity

68/100 integrity
References verified41 of 52
High-severity findings5
Assessment versionEAIPAM-LS 1.0
DOI mismatch

Reference 17 resolves to a different article title and author group.

EAIPAM criteria

What EAIPAM Evaluates

EAIPAM evaluates Reference Integrity, Citation-to-Claim Accuracy, Scientific Accuracy and Evidence Depth because these four criteria determine whether scholarly content is traceable, evidentially supported, scientifically reliable and sufficiently developed.

AI-generated scholarly text frequently appears fluent and authoritative while presenting fabricated or inaccurate references, attaching genuine sources to unsupported claims, combining incompatible scientific concepts and producing broad discussions without adequate quantitative or comparative evidence. Language-based detection alone does not identify these substantive integrity problems.

Reference Integrity

Reference Integrity verifies whether cited publications are authentic and whether bibliographic details such as the DOI, title, authors, journal, year, volume and pagination are accurate and complete.

Importance in scholarly literature

Accurate references allow readers, reviewers and editors to trace the evidence supporting a manuscript. Fabricated, incomplete, duplicated or incorrectly attributed references weaken scholarly credibility and prevent independent verification.

AI-generated content frequently invents publications, combines bibliographic details from different sources, assigns incorrect DOIs, misattributes authors and produces references that do not correspond to identifiable scholarly records.

What makes EAIPAM different

EAIPAM examines the reliability of references, claims, scientific content and supporting evidence rather than relying on language patterns alone.

Calculate assessment price
Contact EAIPAM

Need assistance with submissions, assessments or feedback?

Contact the EAIPAM administrator at eaipam.admin@gmail.com.

Email EAIPAM
Structured commercial delivery

Upload, calculate, assess, approve and deliver from one secure platform.

View pricing model